We can't say anything concrete about how Chris Evans voted on increasing investment in the coal industry
How Chris Evans voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should maintain or increase its investment in and support for the Australian coal industry
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing investment in the coal industry” which Chris Evans could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Chris Evans on this policy.
| Division | Chris Evans | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing investment in the coal industry” which Chris Evans could have attended.
| Division | Chris Evans | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
15th Mar 2012, 12:12 PM – Senate Motions - Coal - From coal to clean energy market |
absent | No |
10th Sep 2009, 9:41 AM – Senate Motions - Coal Exploration and Mining in the Galilee Basin - Concerns |
absent | No |
8th Feb 2007, 10:57 AM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Reduce coal exports |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Chris Evans was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.