We can't say anything concrete about how Chris Evans voted on voluntary student union fees
How Chris Evans voted compared to someone who agrees that university students should be able to choose whether or not to pay student services and amenities fees (also called student union fees)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for voluntary student union fees” which Chris Evans could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Chris Evans on this policy.
| Division | Chris Evans | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
11th Oct 2011 – Senate Higher Education Legislation Amendment (Student Services and Amenities) Bill 2010 - Third Reading - Read a third time |
absent | No |
18th Aug 2009, 1:40 PM – Senate Higher Education Legislation Amendment (Student Services and Amenities, and Other Measures) Bill 2009 - Third Reading - Read a third time |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for voluntary student union fees” which Chris Evans could have attended.
| Division | Chris Evans | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
25th Sep 2008, 9:45 AM – Senate Motions - Voluntary Student Unionism - Agree to motion |
absent | No |
11th Sep 2006, 3:50 PM – Senate Motions - End Voluntary Student Unionism |
Yes | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Chris Evans has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.