We can't say anything concrete about how Chris Ellison voted on requiring a warrant to access citizens’ telecommunications records
How Chris Ellison voted compared to someone who agrees that staff of government agencies should need a warrant before being able to access the telecommunications records of citizens
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for requiring a warrant to access citizens’ telecommunications records” which Chris Ellison could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Chris Ellison on this policy.
| Division | Chris Ellison | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
20th Sep 2007, 7:53 PM – Senate Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment Bill 2007 — In Committee — Require judicial warrants |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for requiring a warrant to access citizens’ telecommunications records” which Chris Ellison could have attended.
| Division | Chris Ellison | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Chris Ellison was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.