We can't say anything concrete about how Ben Small voted on increasing legal protections for LGBTI people
How Ben Small voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase legal protections for people who identify as LGBTI (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Intersex) by, for example, getting rid of all current exemptions that permit discrimination against LGBTI people by religious insitutions (such as schools)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing legal protections for LGBTI people” which Ben Small could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Ben Small on this policy.
| Division | Ben Small | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing legal protections for LGBTI people” which Ben Small could have attended.
| Division | Ben Small | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
22nd Jun 2021, 4:09 PM – Senate Motions - Discrimination - LGBTIQ+ people |
No | Yes |
4th Feb 2021, 12:41 PM – Senate Motions - Gender and Sexual Orientation - National inquiry into conversion practices |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Ben Small has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.