We can't say anything concrete about how Stephen Conroy voted on increasing the foreign aid budget to 0.7% of Gross National Income
How Stephen Conroy voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should allocate 0.7% of Gross National Income (GNI) to foreign aid in line with the United Nations' target
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing the foreign aid budget to 0.7% of Gross National Income” which Stephen Conroy could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Stephen Conroy on this policy.
| Division | Stephen Conroy | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing the foreign aid budget to 0.7% of Gross National Income” which Stephen Conroy could have attended.
| Division | Stephen Conroy | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
14th Mar 2013, 12:17 PM – Senate Motions - International Development Assistance - Increase foreign aid budget to 0.7% of GNI |
absent | Yes |
25th Jun 2012, 3:42 PM – Senate Motions - Foreign Aid Budget - Increase foreign aid budget to 0.7% of GNI |
absent | Yes |
14th Oct 2008, 3:59 PM – Senate Motions - Anti-Poverty Week - Base pension rate + foreign aid budget |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Stephen Conroy was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.