How Stephen Conroy voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should establish a Royal Commission into misconduct within the banking and financial services sector.

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a Royal Commission into banking” which Stephen Conroy could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Stephen Conroy on this policy.

Division Stephen Conroy Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a Royal Commission into banking” which Stephen Conroy could have attended.

Division Stephen Conroy Supporters vote

19th Apr 2016, 7:47 PM – Senate Motions - Financial Services - Royal Commission into banking sector

absent Yes

19th Apr 2016, 6:41 PM – Senate Motions - Financial Services - Establish a Royal Commission

Yes Yes

24th Jun 2015 – Senate Committees — Financial Services

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Stephen Conroy has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.