We can't say anything concrete about how Stephen Conroy voted on stem cell research
How Stephen Conroy voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should allow certain types of stem cell research, including human embryo research
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for stem cell research” which Stephen Conroy could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Stephen Conroy on this policy.
Division | Stephen Conroy | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
7th Nov 2006, 8:53 PM – Senate Prohibition of Human Cloning for Reproduction and the Regulation of Human Embryo Research Amendment Bill 2006 - Third Reading - Read a third time |
absent | Yes |
7th Nov 2006, 1:10 PM – Senate Prohibition of Human Cloning for Reproduction and the Regulation of Human Embryo Research Amendment Bill 2006 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for stem cell research” which Stephen Conroy could have attended.
Division | Stephen Conroy | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
7th Nov 2006, 5:33 PM – Senate Prohibition of Human Cloning for Reproduction and the Regulation of Human Embryo Research Amendment Bill 2006 - In Committee - National Stem Cell Bank |
absent | Yes |
7th Nov 2006, 5:22 PM – Senate Prohibition of Human Cloning for Reproduction and the Regulation of Human Embryo Research Amendment Bill 2006 - In Committee - Deposit of stem cell samples |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Stephen Conroy was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.