We can't say anything concrete about how Stephen Conroy voted on refugee family reunification
How Stephen Conroy voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should ensure that refugees in Australia are able to apply for family reunification visas so that their families can join them in Australia
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for refugee family reunification” which Stephen Conroy could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Stephen Conroy on this policy.
| Division | Stephen Conroy | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
19th Mar 2015, 1:58 PM – Senate Migration Amendment (Protection and Other Measures) Bill 2014 - in Committee - Family protection visas |
absent | No |
17th Jul 2014, 2:21 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Migration Amendment (2014 Measures No. 1) Regulation 2014 - Disallow |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for refugee family reunification” which Stephen Conroy could have attended.
| Division | Stephen Conroy | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
19th Mar 2015 – Senate Migration Amendment (Protection and Other Measures) Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Stephen Conroy was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.