How Stephen Conroy voted compared to someone who agrees that local government should be recognised in the Australian Constitution

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for recognising local government in the Constitution” which Stephen Conroy could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Stephen Conroy on this policy.

Division Stephen Conroy Supporters vote

24th Jun 2013, 8:19 PM – Senate Constitution Alteration (Local Government) 2013 - Third Reading - Pass the bill

absent Yes

24th Jun 2013, 8:11 PM – Senate Constitution Alteration (Local Government) 2013 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea

absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for recognising local government in the Constitution” which Stephen Conroy could have attended.

Division Stephen Conroy Supporters vote

7th Sep 2006, 9:56 AM – Senate Motions - Local Government in Australia - Referendum

Yes Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Stephen Conroy has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.