We can't say anything concrete about how Steph Hodgins-May voted on increasing Aboriginal land rights
How Steph Hodgins-May voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander land rights by, for example, increasing their legal recognition and protection
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing Aboriginal land rights” which Steph Hodgins-May could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Steph Hodgins-May on this policy.
| Division | Steph Hodgins-May | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing Aboriginal land rights” which Steph Hodgins-May could have attended.
| Division | Steph Hodgins-May | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
24th Jun 2024, 4:40 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Native Title - Great Keppel Island |
No | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Steph Hodgins-May has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.