We can't say anything concrete about how Scott Ryan voted on storing all citizens' telecommunications data for access by government agencies
How Scott Ryan voted compared to someone who agrees that telecommunications providers should be required to store all their customers' usages data for later access by agencies with the Attorney General's consent
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for storing all citizens' telecommunications data for access by government agencies” which Scott Ryan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Scott Ryan on this policy.
| Division | Scott Ryan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
26th Mar 2015 – Senate Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment (Data Retention) Bill 2015 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
24th Mar 2015, 8:46 PM – Senate Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Amendment (Data Retention) Bill 2015 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for storing all citizens' telecommunications data for access by government agencies” which Scott Ryan could have attended.
| Division | Scott Ryan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
16th Mar 2016 – Senate Motions - Mandatory Telecommunications Data Retention Scheme - Repeal the scheme |
No | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Scott Ryan has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.