How Scott Ryan voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should conduct a review of our senators and members of parliament (MPs) to make sure that they are all eligible to represent us in Parliament under the Australian Constitution

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a review of our representatives' eligibility” which Scott Ryan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Scott Ryan on this policy.

Division Scott Ryan Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a review of our representatives' eligibility” which Scott Ryan could have attended.

Division Scott Ryan Supporters vote

5th Sep 2017, 5:17 PM – Senate Committees - Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee - Reference

absent Yes

4th Sep 2017, 10:50 AM – Senate Motions - Parliamentary Representation - Qualifications of Senators

absent Yes

15th Aug 2017, 3:53 PM – Senate Committees - Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee - Reference

absent Yes

9th Aug 2017, 4:42 PM – Senate Committees - Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee - Reference

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Scott Ryan was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.