We can't say anything concrete about how Scott Ryan voted on banning all investment in cluster munitions
How Scott Ryan voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should ban both direct and indirect (e.g. through parent companies) investment in cluster munitions
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for banning all investment in cluster munitions” which Scott Ryan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Scott Ryan on this policy.
| Division | Scott Ryan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
21st Aug 2012, 1:44 PM – Senate Criminal Code Amendment (Cluster Munitions Prohibition) Bill 2010 - In Committee - Ban investment |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for banning all investment in cluster munitions” which Scott Ryan could have attended.
| Division | Scott Ryan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
12th May 2011 – Senate Motions - Cluster Bombs - Extend prohibitions |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Scott Ryan was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.