Compare how Scott Ryan and Catryna Bilyk voted on increasing funding for legal aid

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for legal aid” which either Scott Ryan or Catryna Bilyk could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Scott Ryan and Catryna Bilyk on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Scott Ryan	Catryna Bilyk	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for legal aid” which either Scott Ryan or Catryna Bilyk could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Scott Ryan	Catryna Bilyk	Supporters vote
25th Jun 2024, 6:08 PM – Senate Appropriation Bill (No. 5) 2023-2024 and four others - Second Reading - Increase funding for legal assistance services	-	No	Yes
29th Mar 2017, 3:54 PM – Senate Motions - Legal Services - Commit funding	No	Yes	Yes
26th Mar 2015, 1:18 PM – Senate Motions - Legal Aid- Increase funding	No	absent	Yes