Compare how Scott Ryan and Anthony Chisholm voted on increasing parliamentary entitlements for current MPs and Senators

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing parliamentary entitlements for current MPs and Senators” which either Scott Ryan or Anthony Chisholm could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Scott Ryan and Anthony Chisholm on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Scott Ryan	Anthony Chisholm	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing parliamentary entitlements for current MPs and Senators” which either Scott Ryan or Anthony Chisholm could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Scott Ryan	Anthony Chisholm	Supporters vote
3rd Apr 2019, 9:34 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Parliamentary Business Resources Amendment (2019 Measures No. 1) Regulations 2019 - Disallowance	No	Yes	No
21st Mar 2017, 4:08 PM – Senate Motions - Parliamentarians' Entitlements - Do not increase remuneration until in surplus	No	No	No
14th May 2009, 10:34 AM – Senate Motions - Remuneration Tribunal Determination - Electorate allowance	absent	-	No