How Rod Kemp voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase the availability of RU486 and other medications that can induce an abortion

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing availability of abortion drugs” which Rod Kemp could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Rod Kemp on this policy.

Division Rod Kemp Supporters vote

9th Feb 2006, 4:49 PM – Senate Therapeutic Goods Amendment (Repeal of Ministerial Responsibility for Approval of Ru486) Bill 2005 - Third Reading - Read a third time

absent Yes

9th Feb 2006, 12:54 PM – Senate Therapeutic Goods Amendment (Repeal of Ministerial Responsibility for Approval of Ru486) Bill 2005 - Second Reading - Read a second time

absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing availability of abortion drugs” which Rod Kemp could have attended.

Division Rod Kemp Supporters vote

9th Feb 2006, 4:25 PM – Senate Therapeutic Goods Amendment (Repeal of Ministerial Responsibility for Approval of Ru486) Bill 2005 - In Committee - Amend the current process

absent No

9th Feb 2006, 4:07 PM – Senate Therapeutic Goods Amendment (Repeal of Ministerial Responsibility for Approval of Ru486) Bill 2005 - In Committee - Amend the current process

absent No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Rod Kemp was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.