We can't say anything concrete about how Rod Kemp voted on increasing marine conservation
How Rod Kemp voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation and regulations that protect and conserve Australia's marine ecosystems such as the Great Barrier Reef
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing marine conservation” which Rod Kemp could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Rod Kemp on this policy.
| Division | Rod Kemp | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing marine conservation” which Rod Kemp could have attended.
| Division | Rod Kemp | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
21st Jun 2007, 8:40 PM – Senate Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Amendment Bill 2007 - In Committee - extend boundaries of Park to EEZ |
absent | Yes |
30th Mar 2006, 4:18 PM – Senate Motions - Great Barrier Reef Marine Park - Add to endangered list |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Rod Kemp was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.