We can't say anything concrete about how Raff Ciccone voted on climate change inaction
How Raff Ciccone voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should do nothing to address climate change
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for climate change inaction” which Raff Ciccone could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Raff Ciccone on this policy.
| Division | Raff Ciccone | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for climate change inaction” which Raff Ciccone could have attended.
| Division | Raff Ciccone | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
1st Aug 2023, 4:12 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Climate Change - "Fearmongering" |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Raff Ciccone has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.