We can't say anything concrete about how Mitch Fifield voted on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Agreement
How Mitch Fifield voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should support Australia joining the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Agreement, a trade agreement between countries along the rim of the Pacific Ocean, including Canada and New Zealand
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Agreement” which Mitch Fifield could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Mitch Fifield on this policy.
| Division | Mitch Fifield | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
17th Oct 2018, 12:40 PM – Senate Customs Amendment (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership Implementation) Bill 2018 and another - Third Reading - Pass the bills |
absent | Yes |
15th Oct 2018, 9:29 PM – Senate Customs Amendment (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership Implementation) Bill 2018 - Second Reading - Agree with bills' main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Agreement” which Mitch Fifield could have attended.
| Division | Mitch Fifield | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
17th Oct 2018, 12:32 PM – Senate Customs Amendment (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership Implementation) Bill 2018 and another - in Committee - Sunset clause |
absent | No |
17th Oct 2018, 11:30 AM – Senate Customs Amendment (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership Implementation) Bill 2018 - in Committee - Commencement |
absent | No |
16th Oct 2018, 6:49 PM – Senate Customs Amendment (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership Implementation) Bill 2018 - in Committee - Commencement |
absent | No |
15th Oct 2018, 9:25 PM – Senate Customs Amendment (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership Implementation) Bill 2018 and another - Second Reading - Postpone consideration |
No | No |
19th Apr 2016, 7:29 PM – Senate Motions - Steel Industry - Support local industry |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Mitch Fifield has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.