We can't say anything concrete about how Mitch Fifield voted on no new fossil fuels projects
How Mitch Fifield voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should ban all new fossil fuel projects (oil, gas, coal) (for those votes that relate specifically to new thermal coal mines, see the policy "for banning new thermal coal mines")
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for no new fossil fuels projects” which Mitch Fifield could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Mitch Fifield on this policy.
| Division | Mitch Fifield | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for no new fossil fuels projects” which Mitch Fifield could have attended.
| Division | Mitch Fifield | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
9th Sep 2019, 4:55 PM – Senate Motions - Fossil Fuel Basins - Halt development |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Mitch Fifield was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.