We can't say anything concrete about how Mitch Fifield voted on tobacco plain packaging
How Mitch Fifield voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce plain packaging for tobacco products
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for tobacco plain packaging” which Mitch Fifield could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Mitch Fifield on this policy.
| Division | Mitch Fifield | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
18th Sep 2018, 1:13 PM – Senate Tobacco Plain Packaging Amendment Bill 2018 - in Committee - Require manufacturer consent for plain packaging |
absent | No |
10th Nov 2011 – Senate Trade Marks Amendment (Tobacco Plain Packaging) Bill 2011 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for tobacco plain packaging” which Mitch Fifield could have attended.
| Division | Mitch Fifield | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Mitch Fifield was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.