We can't say anything concrete about how Mitch Fifield voted on the Paris Climate Agreement
How Mitch Fifield voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should amend its laws and policies to meet the objectives of the Paris Climate Agreement
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the Paris Climate Agreement” which Mitch Fifield could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Mitch Fifield on this policy.
| Division | Mitch Fifield | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the Paris Climate Agreement” which Mitch Fifield could have attended.
| Division | Mitch Fifield | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
4th Dec 2018, 5:12 PM – Senate Documents - Climate Change - Withdraw from Paris Climate Accord |
No | No |
14th Aug 2018, 3:59 PM – Senate Motions - Paris Agreement - Withdraw |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Mitch Fifield has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.