How Mitch Fifield voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should keep up or increase the amount of money it spends on defence

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for maintaining or increasing defence spending” which Mitch Fifield could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Mitch Fifield on this policy.

Division Mitch Fifield Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for maintaining or increasing defence spending” which Mitch Fifield could have attended.

Division Mitch Fifield Supporters vote

9th May 2017, 3:56 PM – Senate Motions - Military Unmanned Aerial Vehicles - Fund diplomatic network and aid

absent No

22nd Mar 2017 – Senate Motions - Defence Expenditure - Redirect

absent No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Mitch Fifield was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.