Compare how Mitch Fifield and Scott Ludlam voted on the Coalition's Youth Jobs PaTH
Mitch Fifield
Former Liberal Party Senator for Victoria March 2004 – September 2019
Scott Ludlam
Former Australian Greens Senator for WA July 2008 – July 2017
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the Government should introduced the Youth Jobs PaTH, a youth employment plan to assist up to 120,000 jobs seekers under 25 years which includes three phases three phases (skills training, voluntary internships and wage subsidies for businesses)
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the Coalition's Youth Jobs PaTH” which either Mitch Fifield or Scott Ludlam could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Mitch Fifield and Scott Ludlam on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Mitch Fifield | Scott Ludlam | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|---|
10th May 2017, 11:54 AM – Senate Social Security Legislation Amendment (Youth Jobs Path: Prepare, Trial, Hire) Bill 2016 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
Yes | No | Yes |
10th May 2017, 10:18 AM – Senate Social Security Legislation Amendment (Youth Jobs Path: Prepare, Trial, Hire) Bill 2016 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
Yes | No | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the Coalition's Youth Jobs PaTH” which either Mitch Fifield or Scott Ludlam could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Mitch Fifield | Scott Ludlam | Supporters vote | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |