We can't say anything concrete about how Michael Ronaldson voted on giving apprentices access to a $20,000 loan
How Michael Ronaldson voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce a loan program for apprentices, to a maximum of $20,000, like the program currently available for university students
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for giving apprentices access to a $20,000 loan” which Michael Ronaldson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Michael Ronaldson on this policy.
| Division | Michael Ronaldson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
14th Jul 2014, 8:37 PM – Senate Trade Support Loans Bill 2014, Trade Support Loans (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Agree to the main idea (with two provisos) |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for giving apprentices access to a $20,000 loan” which Michael Ronaldson could have attended.
| Division | Michael Ronaldson | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Michael Ronaldson was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.