We can't say anything concrete about how Michael Ronaldson voted on increasing funding for legal aid
How Michael Ronaldson voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should maintain or increase funding for the legal assistance sector (Legal Aid, community legal centres, etc.)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for legal aid” which Michael Ronaldson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Michael Ronaldson on this policy.
| Division | Michael Ronaldson | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for legal aid” which Michael Ronaldson could have attended.
| Division | Michael Ronaldson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
26th Mar 2015, 1:18 PM – Senate Motions - Legal Aid- Increase funding |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Michael Ronaldson was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.