We can't say anything concrete about how Michael Ronaldson voted on recognising local government in the Constitution
How Michael Ronaldson voted compared to someone who agrees that local government should be recognised in the Australian Constitution
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for recognising local government in the Constitution” which Michael Ronaldson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Michael Ronaldson on this policy.
Division | Michael Ronaldson | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
24th Jun 2013, 8:19 PM – Senate Constitution Alteration (Local Government) 2013 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
24th Jun 2013, 8:11 PM – Senate Constitution Alteration (Local Government) 2013 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for recognising local government in the Constitution” which Michael Ronaldson could have attended.
Division | Michael Ronaldson | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
7th Sep 2006, 9:56 AM – Senate Motions - Local Government in Australia - Referendum |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Michael Ronaldson has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.