We can't say anything concrete about how Lisa Darmanin voted on increasing Aboriginal land rights
How Lisa Darmanin voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander land rights by, for example, increasing their legal recognition and protection
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing Aboriginal land rights” which Lisa Darmanin could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Lisa Darmanin on this policy.
| Division | Lisa Darmanin | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing Aboriginal land rights” which Lisa Darmanin could have attended.
| Division | Lisa Darmanin | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
24th Jun 2024, 4:40 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Native Title - Great Keppel Island |
No | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Lisa Darmanin has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.