We can't say anything concrete about how Lidia Thorpe voted on encouraging Australian-based industry
How Lidia Thorpe voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should encourage Australian-based industry and secure the jobs these industries create by, for example, providing incentives for companies to stay in Australia (note that there are specific policies in respect to the timber, dairy, shipping, coal, and film & TV industries, which means that votes specific to those subjects are not included here)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for encouraging Australian-based industry” which Lidia Thorpe could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Lidia Thorpe on this policy.
| Division | Lidia Thorpe | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for encouraging Australian-based industry” which Lidia Thorpe could have attended.
| Division | Lidia Thorpe | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
21st Jun 2023, 4:49 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Middle Arm Sustainable Development Precinct |
absent | No |
28th Mar 2023, 8:48 PM – Senate National Reconstruction Fund Corporation Bill 2023 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
28th Mar 2023, 4:52 PM – Senate National Reconstruction Fund Corporation Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
12th Nov 2020, 12:18 PM – Senate Motions - COVID-19 - Employment |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Lidia Thorpe has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.