We can't say anything concrete about how Lidia Thorpe voted on the federal government calling for a ceasefire in Gaza (2023-24)
How Lidia Thorpe voted compared to someone who agrees that the Australian Government should call for an immediate and permanent ceasefire to end the humanitarian disaster in Gaza that began in October 2023, which is now the subject of an ongoing case in the International Court of Justice (ICJ), in which South Africa is accusing Israel of genocide
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the federal government calling for a ceasefire in Gaza (2023-24)” which Lidia Thorpe could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Lidia Thorpe on this policy.
| Division | Lidia Thorpe | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
7th Nov 2023, 4:50 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Israel - Immediate ceasefire |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the federal government calling for a ceasefire in Gaza (2023-24)” which Lidia Thorpe could have attended.
| Division | Lidia Thorpe | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
18th Oct 2023, 9:06 AM – Senate Motions - Israel - Condemn war crimes |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Lidia Thorpe was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.