We can't say anything concrete about how Lidia Thorpe voted on limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees
How Lidia Thorpe voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should commit to a target of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees celsius above pre-industrial levels
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees ” which Lidia Thorpe could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Lidia Thorpe on this policy.
| Division | Lidia Thorpe | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees ” which Lidia Thorpe could have attended.
| Division | Lidia Thorpe | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
7th Mar 2023, 5:13 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Climate Change - Safeguard Mechanism reform |
absent | Yes |
10th Aug 2021, 5:10 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Climate Change - Emergency ation needed |
absent | Yes |
11th Nov 2020, 4:20 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Take urgent action |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Lidia Thorpe has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.