We can't say anything concrete about how Lidia Thorpe voted on assisting the Arts sector through the coronavirus pandemic
How Lidia Thorpe voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should develop a specific Coronavirus (COVID-19) response package for the Arts and Entertainment sector as many workers in that sector are ineligible for the JobKeeper Payment
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for assisting the Arts sector through the coronavirus pandemic” which Lidia Thorpe could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Lidia Thorpe on this policy.
| Division | Lidia Thorpe | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for assisting the Arts sector through the coronavirus pandemic” which Lidia Thorpe could have attended.
| Division | Lidia Thorpe | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
2nd Sep 2021, 10:48 AM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 2) Bill 2021 - in Committee - Live Performance Federal Insurance Guarantee Fund |
absent | Yes |
23rd Feb 2021, 4:57 PM – Senate Motions - Jobkeeper Payment - Arts and Entertainment Industry |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Lidia Thorpe has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.