We can't say anything concrete about how Lidia Thorpe voted on Continuing Detention Orders (CDOs)
How Lidia Thorpe voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce laws that allow people who have been convicted of certain terrorist offences to be kept in detention even after their custodial sentences have ended if there is an unacceptable risk that they will commit certain serious terrorism offences after being released
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for Continuing Detention Orders (CDOs)” which Lidia Thorpe could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Lidia Thorpe on this policy.
| Division | Lidia Thorpe | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
12th Aug 2021, 12:53 PM – Senate Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment (Sunsetting Review and Other Measures) Bill 2021 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for Continuing Detention Orders (CDOs)” which Lidia Thorpe could have attended.
| Division | Lidia Thorpe | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Lidia Thorpe was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.