We can't say anything concrete about how Kimberley Kitching voted on tighter means testing of family payments
How Kimberley Kitching voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should target family payments to low and moderate income households, to the exclusion of higher income households.
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for tighter means testing of family payments ” which Kimberley Kitching could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kimberley Kitching on this policy.
| Division | Kimberley Kitching | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for tighter means testing of family payments ” which Kimberley Kitching could have attended.
| Division | Kimberley Kitching | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
22nd Mar 2017, 12:04 AM – Senate Social Services Legislation Amendment Bill 2017 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Kimberley Kitching was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.