We can't say anything concrete about how Kimberley Kitching voted on increasing eligibility requirements for Australian citizenship
How Kimberley Kitching voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should take a restrictive approach to granting Australian citizenship by introducing more eligibility requirements, such as applicants needing greater English language proficiency and needing to spend more time living in Australia before they can submit their applications
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing eligibility requirements for Australian citizenship” which Kimberley Kitching could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kimberley Kitching on this policy.
| Division | Kimberley Kitching | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing eligibility requirements for Australian citizenship” which Kimberley Kitching could have attended.
| Division | Kimberley Kitching | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
12th Nov 2020, 12:13 PM – Senate Motions - Australian Languages - Role of English in Australia |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Kimberley Kitching was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.