Compare how Kimberley Kitching and Sam McMahon voted on increasing trade unions' powers in the workplace

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing trade unions' powers in the workplace” which either Kimberley Kitching or Sam McMahon could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kimberley Kitching and Sam McMahon on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Kimberley Kitching	Sam McMahon	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing trade unions' powers in the workplace” which either Kimberley Kitching or Sam McMahon could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Kimberley Kitching	Sam McMahon	Supporters vote
25th Feb 2020, 4:43 PM – Senate Motions - Workplace Relations - Greyhound Resources	Yes	No	Yes
12th Nov 2019, 1:22 PM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Prohibiting Energy Market Misconduct) Bill 2019 - in Committee - Non-registered agreements	Yes	No	Yes
16th Oct 2017, 1:46 PM – Senate Competition and Consumer Amendment (Competition Policy Review) Bill 2017 - in Committee - Secondary boycotts	No	-	No