We can't say anything concrete about how Kim Carr voted on government administered paid parental leave
How Kim Carr voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should administer the paid parental leave scheme rather than employers
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for government administered paid parental leave” which Kim Carr could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kim Carr on this policy.
Division | Kim Carr | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
17th Jun 2010, 12:09 PM – Senate Paid Parental Leave Bill 2010, Paid Parental Leave (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2010 - In Committee - Administration of payment |
absent | No |
16th Jun 2010, 6:29 PM – Senate Paid Parental Leave Bill 2010, Paid Parental Leave (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2010 - In Committee - Administration of payment |
absent | No |
16th Jun 2010, 6:20 PM – Senate Paid Parental Leave Bill 2010, Paid Parental Leave (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2010 - In Committee - Administration of Payment |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for government administered paid parental leave” which Kim Carr could have attended.
Division | Kim Carr | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
14th Jun 2007, 9:45 AM – Senate Motions - Paid Maternity Leave - Government funded paid maternity leave |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Kim Carr has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.