We can't say anything concrete about how Kim Carr voted on carbon farming
How Kim Carr voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce a carbon farming initiative that encourages the farming and timber industries to decrease carbon emissions or to increase carbon storage (known as carbon sequestration)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for carbon farming” which Kim Carr could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kim Carr on this policy.
| Division | Kim Carr | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
22nd Aug 2011 – Senate Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011 - In Committee - Agree to the bill |
absent | Yes |
22nd Aug 2011 – Senate Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011 and related bills - Third Reading - Read a third time |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for carbon farming” which Kim Carr could have attended.
| Division | Kim Carr | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
18th Aug 2011 – Senate Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011 - In Committee - Greenhouse Friendly program |
No | No |
6th Jul 2011 – Senate Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011 - In Committee - Future act provisions and State/Territory minister consent |
absent | No |
6th Jul 2011 – Senate Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011 - Second Reading - Consider further after 10 July 2011 |
absent | No |
6th Jul 2011 – Senate Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Bill 2011 - Second Reading - Consider further after regulations laid on the table |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Kim Carr has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.