How Kim Carr voted compared to someone who agrees that all Australian laws should be subject to procedural fairness requirements so that Australians can request reasons for government decisions that impact them personally and can appeal those decisions on the basis of whether they were made lawfully

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for procedural fairness” which Kim Carr could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kim Carr on this policy.

Division Kim Carr Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for procedural fairness” which Kim Carr could have attended.

Division Kim Carr Supporters vote

30th Mar 2022, 8:37 PM – Senate National Disability Insurance Scheme Amendment (Participant Service Guarantee and Other Measures) Bill 2022 - Consideration of amendments - Greens amendments

absent Yes

3rd Dec 2020, 9:44 AM – Senate Australia's Foreign Relations (State and Territory Arrangements) Bill 2020 - in Committee - Procedural fairness

absent No

2nd Dec 2020, 7:24 PM – Senate Australia's Foreign Relations (State and Territory Arrangements) Bill 2020 and another - in Committee - Reasons and review

absent Yes

2nd Dec 2020, 12:40 PM – Senate Australia's Foreign Relations (State and Territory Arrangements) Bill 2020 and another - in Committee - Reasons and review

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Kim Carr was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.