We can't say anything concrete about how Kim Carr voted on privatising government-owned assets
How Kim Carr voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should privatise government owned assets
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for privatising government-owned assets” which Kim Carr could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kim Carr on this policy.
| Division | Kim Carr | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for privatising government-owned assets” which Kim Carr could have attended.
| Division | Kim Carr | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
14th Feb 2018, 4:06 PM – Senate Motions - Energy - Return to public ownership |
absent | No |
28th Aug 2014, 10:02 AM – Senate Land Transport Infrastructure Amendment Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
absent | Yes |
13th Sep 2007, 9:43 AM – Senate Motions - New South Wales Electricity Industry - Abandon plan to privatise |
absent | No |
5th Dec 2006, 12:47 PM – Senate Medibank Private Sale Bill 2006 - Third Reading - Read a third time |
absent | Yes |
4th Dec 2006, 8:28 PM – Senate Medibank Private Sale Bill 2006 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Kim Carr has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.