We can't say anything concrete about how Kim Carr voted on the Paris Climate Agreement
How Kim Carr voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should amend its laws and policies to meet the objectives of the Paris Climate Agreement
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the Paris Climate Agreement” which Kim Carr could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kim Carr on this policy.
| Division | Kim Carr | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the Paris Climate Agreement” which Kim Carr could have attended.
| Division | Kim Carr | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
3rd Dec 2020, 12:26 PM – Senate Motions - Paris Agreement - Kyoto carryover credits |
absent | Yes |
16th Oct 2019, 4:40 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change, Petroleum Industry - No new coal, oil or gas projects |
absent | Yes |
16th Oct 2019, 4:35 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Address and adapt |
absent | Yes |
16th Oct 2019, 4:12 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Address |
absent | Yes |
4th Dec 2018, 5:12 PM – Senate Documents - Climate Change - Withdraw from Paris Climate Accord |
absent | No |
14th Aug 2018, 3:59 PM – Senate Motions - Paris Agreement - Withdraw |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Kim Carr was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.