We can't say anything concrete about how Kim Carr voted on ceremonial recognition of the first people in Australia
How Kim Carr voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should support efforts to close the gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians by also supporting ceremonial inititiatives that aim to recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and nations
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for ceremonial recognition of the first people in Australia” which Kim Carr could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kim Carr on this policy.
Division | Kim Carr | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for ceremonial recognition of the first people in Australia” which Kim Carr could have attended.
Division | Kim Carr | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
10th May 2006, 3:47 PM – Senate Motions - National Sorry Day - Day of remembrance |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Kim Carr was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.