How Kim Carr voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should make it a criminal offence to share intimate images without consent (known colloquially as "revenge porn") and not just leave it up to the state-level governments to criminalise it separately in each State and Territory

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for criminalising "revenge porn"” which Kim Carr could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kim Carr on this policy.

Division Kim Carr Supporters vote

14th Feb 2018, 11:54 AM – Senate Enhancing Online Safety (Non-Consensual Sharing of Intimate Images) Bill 2017 - in Committee - Criminal offences

absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for criminalising "revenge porn"” which Kim Carr could have attended.

Division Kim Carr Supporters vote

13th Feb 2018, 7:11 PM – Senate Enhancing Online Safety (Non-Consensual Sharing of Intimate Images) Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Criminalise

absent Yes

19th Jun 2017, 1:52 PM – Senate Enhancing Online Safety for Children Amendment Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Criminalise "revenge porn"

Yes Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Kim Carr has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.