We can't say anything concrete about how Kim Carr voted on the Coalition's new schools funding policy ("Gonski 2.0")
How Kim Carr voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should implement the Coalition's new funding policy, proposed under Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull and dubbed "Gonski 2.0", so that it replaces the previous Labor Government's Gonski agreements
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the Coalition's new schools funding policy ("Gonski 2.0")” which Kim Carr could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kim Carr on this policy.
| Division | Kim Carr | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
22nd Jun 2017, 9:58 PM – Senate Australian Education Amendment Bill 2017 - in Committee - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
22nd Jun 2017, 1:02 AM – Senate Australian Education Amendment Bill 2017 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
21st Jun 2017, 12:27 PM – Senate Australian Education Amendment Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the Coalition's new schools funding policy ("Gonski 2.0")” which Kim Carr could have attended.
| Division | Kim Carr | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
21st Jun 2017, 12:23 PM – Senate Australian Education Amendment Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Criticism of Gonski 2.0 |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Kim Carr was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.