Compare how Kay Patterson and Linda Kirk voted on protecting threatened forest and bushland habitats

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for protecting threatened forest and bushland habitats” which either Kay Patterson or Linda Kirk could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kay Patterson and Linda Kirk on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Kay Patterson	Linda Kirk	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for protecting threatened forest and bushland habitats” which either Kay Patterson or Linda Kirk could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Kay Patterson	Linda Kirk	Supporters vote
29th Nov 2006, 3:45 PM – Senate Motions - Logging in Tasmania’s Weld River Valley - Halt logging	No	No	Yes
28th Mar 2006, 3:52 PM – Senate Motions - Wedge-Tailed Eagle - Protect habitat	No	No	Yes