We can't say anything concrete about how Julian McGauran voted on protecting the Great Barrier Reef
How Julian McGauran voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should make laws and regulations that protect and conserve the health of the Great Barrier Reef for future generations
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for protecting the Great Barrier Reef” which Julian McGauran could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Julian McGauran on this policy.
| Division | Julian McGauran | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for protecting the Great Barrier Reef” which Julian McGauran could have attended.
| Division | Julian McGauran | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
24th Jun 2008, 3:48 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Act on conference conclusions |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Julian McGauran was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.