Compare how Judith Troeth and Grant Chapman voted on increasing scrutiny of asylum seeker management

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing scrutiny of asylum seeker management” which either Judith Troeth or Grant Chapman could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Judith Troeth and Grant Chapman on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Judith Troeth Grant Chapman Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing scrutiny of asylum seeker management” which either Judith Troeth or Grant Chapman could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Judith Troeth Grant Chapman Supporters vote

24th Nov 2009, 3:41 PM – Senate Border Protection Committee of Cabinet Meeting - Order - Produce documents

Yes - Yes

27th Aug 2008, 4:21 PM – Senate Motions - MV Tampa: Seventh Anniversary - Inquiry into immigration detention

No - Yes

10th May 2007, 10:17 AM – Senate Motions - Iraq - Information requested

No No Yes

2nd Mar 2006, 11:37 AM – Senate Committees - Legal and Constitutional References Committee - Refer

No No Yes