We can't say anything concrete about how John Madigan voted on a declared area offence
How John Madigan voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should make it an offence to enter or remain in areas that have been listed as “declared areas” by the Minister for Foreign Affairs because of terrorist activity (such as the Mosul district in Iraq and Al-Raqqa Province in Syria)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a declared area offence” which John Madigan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of John Madigan on this policy.
| Division | John Madigan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
29th Oct 2014, 11:56 AM – Senate Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment (Foreign Fighters) Bill 2014 - in Committee - Support offence of entering and staying in a declared area |
absent | Yes |
29th Oct 2014 – Senate Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment (Foreign Fighters) Bill 2014 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
28th Oct 2014, 7:59 PM – Senate Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment (Foreign Fighters) Bill 2014 — Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a declared area offence” which John Madigan could have attended.
| Division | John Madigan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
29th Oct 2014, 12:41 PM – Senate Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment (Foreign Fighters) Bill 2014 - in Committee - Australian Greens amendments |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case John Madigan was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.