We can't say anything concrete about how Janet Rice voted on assisting the Arts sector through the coronavirus pandemic
How Janet Rice voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should develop a specific Coronavirus (COVID-19) response package for the Arts and Entertainment sector as many workers in that sector are ineligible for the JobKeeper Payment
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for assisting the Arts sector through the coronavirus pandemic” which Janet Rice could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Janet Rice on this policy.
| Division | Janet Rice | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for assisting the Arts sector through the coronavirus pandemic” which Janet Rice could have attended.
| Division | Janet Rice | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
2nd Sep 2021, 10:48 AM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (2021 Measures No. 2) Bill 2021 - in Committee - Live Performance Federal Insurance Guarantee Fund |
absent | Yes |
23rd Feb 2021, 4:57 PM – Senate Motions - Jobkeeper Payment - Arts and Entertainment Industry |
Yes | Yes |
8th Apr 2020, 8:22 PM – Senate Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Bill 2020 and related bills - Second Reading - JobKeeper accessibility and the Arts |
absent | Yes |
8th Apr 2020, 8:19 PM – Senate Coronavirus Economic Response Package (Payments and Benefits) Bill 2020 and related bills - Second Reading - Accessibility of support |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Janet Rice has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.