Compare how Janet Rice and Amanda Stoker voted on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Agreement
Janet Rice
Former Australian Greens Senator for Victoria July 2014 – April 2024
Amanda Stoker
Former Liberal Party Senator for Queensland March 2018 – May 2022
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should support Australia joining the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Agreement, a trade agreement between countries along the rim of the Pacific Ocean, including Canada and New Zealand
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Agreement” which either Janet Rice or Amanda Stoker could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Janet Rice and Amanda Stoker on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Janet Rice | Amanda Stoker | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
17th Oct 2018, 12:40 PM – Senate Customs Amendment (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership Implementation) Bill 2018 and another - Third Reading - Pass the bills |
No | Yes | Yes |
15th Oct 2018, 9:29 PM – Senate Customs Amendment (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership Implementation) Bill 2018 - Second Reading - Agree with bills' main idea |
No | Yes | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) Agreement” which either Janet Rice or Amanda Stoker could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Janet Rice | Amanda Stoker | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
17th Oct 2018, 12:32 PM – Senate Customs Amendment (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership Implementation) Bill 2018 and another - in Committee - Sunset clause |
Yes | No | No |
17th Oct 2018, 11:30 AM – Senate Customs Amendment (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership Implementation) Bill 2018 - in Committee - Commencement |
Yes | No | No |
16th Oct 2018, 6:49 PM – Senate Customs Amendment (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership Implementation) Bill 2018 - in Committee - Commencement |
Yes | No | No |
15th Oct 2018, 9:25 PM – Senate Customs Amendment (Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership Implementation) Bill 2018 and another - Second Reading - Postpone consideration |
Yes | No | No |
19th Apr 2016, 7:29 PM – Senate Motions - Steel Industry - Support local industry |
Yes | - | No |